In an article from Yahoo! Sports yesterday, it was revealed that tennis legend Andre Agassi has, to date, managed to raise $175 million for charity. Such a staggering amount was likely made possible by his success as an internationally recognized tennis champion, but Agassi's accomplishments are more appropriately attributable to his devotion to helping out those in need.
According to Agassi, the group in most need of assistance is American children who would benefit from an improved education system. Specifically through the Andre Agassi College Preparatory Academy out of Las Vegas, Agassi helps elementary, middle, and high school students every year. Their mission is to prepare students from under served communities to excel and graduate from the top 100 college and universities in the nation.
This is the kind of lasting impact that I want Zero2Sixty to have on our community. With a fund that size (or even half of that size) massive funding can go to support programs designed to fight hunger, homelessness, illness, and low-quality education - with little more than interest earned on the portfolio! Without having to deplete assets, and allowing new contributions to further grow the fund, a portfolio this big will truly be a game changer.
When we reach our goal balance of $60 million, and assuming a reasonable return of 7% on the portfolio, we will be able to provide over 4 million dollars per year to charitable causes nationwide, and still grow the fund.
Please keep a look out for my first fundraising campaign, which will fund incorporation, tax-exempt filing, and administrative start-up costs. This initial campaign will likely be a pledge-a-thon attached to a distance running event. Please give generously and often, as the size of the fund early on will have exponential impacts of the size it will become in the future.
Brian Anderson
@BrianWA33
www.facebook.com/bwanderson2
Zero 2 Sixty
"Charity is the opium of the privileged." -Chinua Achebe
Friday, November 16, 2012
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Is That Charity Legit??
11/6/12
Happy Election Day! Make sure you get out and vote before your poll closes.
I wanted to write a quick note to those interested in donating to charity, but are hesitant to select one. Are you ever concerned that you aren't picking a good charity? Is this how you feel when trying to decide whom to give your money to?
While its true that some organizations are fake charities, and some others don't pass 100% of your denotation on to the needy, we do have resources available to find the ones that are really putting all of our donations to good use.
I look forward to giving frequent advice on how to select legit charities, but the one resource that I'll offer today is the Wise Giving Alliance, a Charity-focused division of the Better Business Bureau (BBB). You can access their site by clicking here.
If nothing else, you may find the documented list of complaints and reviews that have been collected on certain charities, so please check with them if you're concerned, and don't let uncertainty lead to not giving.
Brian
Happy Election Day! Make sure you get out and vote before your poll closes.
I wanted to write a quick note to those interested in donating to charity, but are hesitant to select one. Are you ever concerned that you aren't picking a good charity? Is this how you feel when trying to decide whom to give your money to?
While its true that some organizations are fake charities, and some others don't pass 100% of your denotation on to the needy, we do have resources available to find the ones that are really putting all of our donations to good use.
I look forward to giving frequent advice on how to select legit charities, but the one resource that I'll offer today is the Wise Giving Alliance, a Charity-focused division of the Better Business Bureau (BBB). You can access their site by clicking here.
If nothing else, you may find the documented list of complaints and reviews that have been collected on certain charities, so please check with them if you're concerned, and don't let uncertainty lead to not giving.
Brian
Saturday, November 3, 2012
Charitable Tax Deductions
11/4/12
Now that my mid-term exams are over for this fall semester (whew!), I have been doing a little extra-curricular reading and researching for the fund, and came across a great article from The Chronicle of Philanthropy last week detailed an on-going debate about tax deductions for charitable contributions.
Nonprofit Leaders Urge Obama and Romney to Protect Tax Break
The growing federal deficit has sparked conversation/debate/argument about how to change ("reform") the tax code. Both candidates have, at one point or another, made it clear that they will support changes that adversely affect charitable donations.
President Obama has said that while he does not support eliminating the charitable tax deduction, he does support putting a cap on the amount that tax payers can write off - lowing the current cap of 35% to 28%, for high-income earners.
According to the article, Congress has never supported such a low cap on charitable deductions, but with the size of the national debt quickly becoming an even hotter topic, donors may soon find themselves without the same incentives to give as they had before.
Governor Romney, on the other hand, has made it clear that he supports a (virtually) flat tax across the board. He plans on implementing a revenue-neutral reorganization of our income tax levels, which (if you do the math*) means that all deductions, include the mortgage interest deduction and the charitable tax deduction. Depending on where we fall on the Laffer Curve** it is possible that a lower overall tax rate will result in an increase in total revenue for the government, thereby allowing Washington to start paying down the debt. This would certainly be a good thing for the U.S. balance sheet, but citizens are left without a tax incentive to contribute their money to charities!
It is important to retain this charitable deduction, so as to incentivize donors to contribute their money to help those who need it. Although there are debates about which organizations are/should be covered by the charitable deduction, it is irrefutable that without a tax incentive (or with less of a tax incentive), charities will not be able to operate as effectively or as thoroughly.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
*Governor Romney's proposed lower tax rates will cut revenue by almost 1.2 trillion per year, and in order to have a revenue neutral result, he would have to simultaneously eliminate all of the available tax deductions and write-offs, which total to about 1.1 trillion per year.
**The Laffer Curve suggests that there are some situations in which a tax-rate increase would yield more total revenue.... but only to a point. After this critical tax rate, marginally higher tax rates cause people to stop working as hard or to stop working at all (because they get to take home less of their hard-earned money), therefore decreasing the total tax revenue collected, despite the higher rate. The kicker is that it is impossible to know in which situation we live, for even if we conduct a conscious experiment, there are too many factors in revenue generation to attribute the results to the change in tax rates.
Now that my mid-term exams are over for this fall semester (whew!), I have been doing a little extra-curricular reading and researching for the fund, and came across a great article from The Chronicle of Philanthropy last week detailed an on-going debate about tax deductions for charitable contributions.
Nonprofit Leaders Urge Obama and Romney to Protect Tax Break
The growing federal deficit has sparked conversation/debate/argument about how to change ("reform") the tax code. Both candidates have, at one point or another, made it clear that they will support changes that adversely affect charitable donations.
President Obama has said that while he does not support eliminating the charitable tax deduction, he does support putting a cap on the amount that tax payers can write off - lowing the current cap of 35% to 28%, for high-income earners.
According to the article, Congress has never supported such a low cap on charitable deductions, but with the size of the national debt quickly becoming an even hotter topic, donors may soon find themselves without the same incentives to give as they had before.
Governor Romney, on the other hand, has made it clear that he supports a (virtually) flat tax across the board. He plans on implementing a revenue-neutral reorganization of our income tax levels, which (if you do the math*) means that all deductions, include the mortgage interest deduction and the charitable tax deduction. Depending on where we fall on the Laffer Curve** it is possible that a lower overall tax rate will result in an increase in total revenue for the government, thereby allowing Washington to start paying down the debt. This would certainly be a good thing for the U.S. balance sheet, but citizens are left without a tax incentive to contribute their money to charities!
It is important to retain this charitable deduction, so as to incentivize donors to contribute their money to help those who need it. Although there are debates about which organizations are/should be covered by the charitable deduction, it is irrefutable that without a tax incentive (or with less of a tax incentive), charities will not be able to operate as effectively or as thoroughly.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
*Governor Romney's proposed lower tax rates will cut revenue by almost 1.2 trillion per year, and in order to have a revenue neutral result, he would have to simultaneously eliminate all of the available tax deductions and write-offs, which total to about 1.1 trillion per year.
**The Laffer Curve suggests that there are some situations in which a tax-rate increase would yield more total revenue.... but only to a point. After this critical tax rate, marginally higher tax rates cause people to stop working as hard or to stop working at all (because they get to take home less of their hard-earned money), therefore decreasing the total tax revenue collected, despite the higher rate. The kicker is that it is impossible to know in which situation we live, for even if we conduct a conscious experiment, there are too many factors in revenue generation to attribute the results to the change in tax rates.
Friday, November 2, 2012
Hurricane Relief Fund
11/2/2012
We have all seen the destruction of Sandy over the past week, and can share in our sympathy for the people killed, hurt, or displaced. When FZTC is up and running (with your help, sooner rather than later), it will be positioned to provide much needed relief from these kinds of disasters.
Hurricane Aftermath Video (ABC News)
As it stands now, however, I'm happy to at the least do some quick research to find a great charity to give through.
American Red Cross Hurricane Aid
Millions of people need your help right now, trying to put their lives back together without any kind of infrastructure to speak of. Give generously and be thankful that the damage wasn't worse.
Brian
We have all seen the destruction of Sandy over the past week, and can share in our sympathy for the people killed, hurt, or displaced. When FZTC is up and running (with your help, sooner rather than later), it will be positioned to provide much needed relief from these kinds of disasters.
Hurricane Aftermath Video (ABC News)
As it stands now, however, I'm happy to at the least do some quick research to find a great charity to give through.
American Red Cross Hurricane Aid
Millions of people need your help right now, trying to put their lives back together without any kind of infrastructure to speak of. Give generously and be thankful that the damage wasn't worse.
Brian
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)